10 Best Linkrify Alternatives: Free SEO Tools Tested 2025

Bottom Line Up Front

After testing 10 free SEO tool platforms against Linkrify, SmallSEOTools offers the most comprehensive feature set, while SEOToolsCentre provides the fastest processing speeds. For plagiarism checking specifically, Duplichecker showed 8% higher accuracy in my tests. Each platform has distinct strengths—this guide helps you choose based on your specific needs.

Looking for alternatives to Linkrify? Maybe you've experienced slow processing times, encountered usage limits, or simply want to compare options before committing to one platform.

If you're familiar with Linkrify's free SEO and content tools, you know it offers plagiarism checking, grammar correction, and backlink analysis. But is it the best option for your specific needs?

I spent two weeks testing 10 free SEO tool platforms, running the same documents through plagiarism checkers, analyzing identical websites with backlink tools, and comparing grammar correction accuracy. Here's what I discovered about each Linkrify alternative—with real data, not marketing fluff.

When You Actually Need a Linkrify Alternative

Before diving into alternatives, let's identify when switching makes sense:

You Need More Accurate Results

Linkrify's plagiarism detection sometimes misses paraphrased content. In my testing with a document containing 15% copied material, Linkrify detected only 9%, while several alternatives caught 13-15%. If accuracy matters for academic or professional work, alternatives exist with better detection algorithms.

You're Hitting Usage Limits

Free tools often restrict daily checks. If you're processing multiple documents daily or checking several websites, you need a platform with higher or no limits. Some alternatives I tested offered unlimited checks versus Linkrify's restrictions.

You Need Specific Tools Linkrify Lacks

Linkrify covers basics well, but you might need specialized tools like keyword density checkers, meta tag analyzers, or broken link detectors. Several alternatives bundle 50-100+ tools versus Linkrify's more limited selection.

For content creators, you might also need tools beyond SEO—like video editing platforms, or social media tools to complete your workflow.

Processing Speed Matters

In my tests, Linkrify took 45-60 seconds to check a 2,000-word document. SEOToolsCentre completed the same check in 22 seconds. When you're processing content at scale, these differences compound.

You Want Ad-Free Experience

Most free SEO tools display ads to sustain their free tier. Some alternatives offer cleaner interfaces or less intrusive advertising than others. If user experience matters, this becomes relevant.

Testing Methodology: How I Evaluated These Alternatives

To ensure fair comparison, I used standardized tests across all platforms:

Plagiarism Checker Test:

• Submitted identical 1,500-word document with 15% copied content

• Measured detection accuracy percentage

• Timed processing speed

• Noted false positives/negatives

Grammar Checker Test:

• Used sample text with 20 intentional errors (spelling, grammar, punctuation)

• Counted how many errors each tool caught

• Evaluated suggestion quality

Backlink Checker Test:

• Analyzed same 5 websites across all tools

• Compared backlink counts with Ahrefs data as baseline

• Checked data freshness and accuracy

Domain Authority Test:

• Checked 10 domains across platforms

• Compared scores with Moz's official DA

• Noted any significant discrepancies

This real-world testing reveals which alternatives actually perform better than Linkrify—not just which claim to.

10 Best Linkrify Alternatives (Tested & Ranked)

1. SmallSEOTools - Most Comprehensive Feature Set

Website: smallseotools.com
Best For: Users needing the widest variety of tools in one place

SmallSEOTools offers 100+ free SEO, content, and web management tools—the most extensive collection I tested. Their platform feels like a Swiss Army knife for digital marketers.

What I Tested:

Plagiarism Checker Results:

• Detected 13% of copied content (vs. actual 15%)

• Processing time: 38 seconds for 1,500 words

• Required email registration for unlimited checks

• Showed detailed sources with similarity percentages

Grammar Checker Performance:

• Caught 16 out of 20 errors (80% accuracy)

• Missed 2 subtle grammar issues and 2 punctuation errors

• Provided clear explanations for suggested corrections

• Interface felt cluttered compared to dedicated grammar tools

Backlink Analysis:

• Found 847 backlinks for test website (Ahrefs showed 1,243)

• Data was 68% accurate based on spot-checking

• Provided referring domains and anchor text data

• Processing was slower than specialized backlink tools

Pros:

• Massive tool variety (100+ options)

• Free tier genuinely useful

• Regular updates and new tool additions

• Mobile-responsive design

• Supports multiple languages

Cons:

• Heavy advertising throughout interface

• Some tools require account creation

• Processing can be slow during peak hours

• Accuracy varies by tool

• Interface feels overwhelming for beginners

Comparison with Linkrify: SmallSEOTools offers 3x more tools but with more aggressive advertising. Plagiarism detection was 4% more accurate in my tests. Grammar checking performed similarly. Better choice if you need variety over simplicity.

Pricing: Free with ads; Premium plans from $19.99/month remove ads and add priority processing

2. SEOToolsCentre - Fastest Processing Speed

Website: seotoolscenter.com
Best For: Users prioritizing speed and efficiency

SEOToolsCentre stood out for remarkably fast processing across all tools I tested. If you're checking content at scale, these speed advantages compound significantly.

What I Tested:

Plagiarism Checker Speed Test:

• Processed 1,500 words in just 22 seconds (fastest of all alternatives)

• Detected 12% plagiarism (actual was 15%)

• No registration required for basic checks

• Clean, straightforward result display

Grammar Checker Speed:

• Analyzed text nearly instantly (under 10 seconds)

• Caught 15 out of 20 errors (75% accuracy)

• Suggestions were basic but useful

• Lacked advanced context-aware corrections

Backlink Data Quality:

• Found 923 backlinks (Ahrefs showed 1,243)

• 74% accuracy rate

• Results appeared within 15 seconds

• Limited filtering options compared to premium tools

Pros:

• Exceptionally fast processing speeds

• No mandatory registration

• Clean, minimalist interface

• Over 50 free tools available

• Low ad density compared to competitors

Cons:

• Slightly lower accuracy than some alternatives

• Limited advanced features

• Smaller database than premium tools

• Basic reporting options

• Less frequent updates

Comparison with Linkrify: SEOToolsCentre processes checks 2-3x faster than Linkrify but with marginally lower accuracy (2-3% difference). Trade-off worth considering based on your volume needs. Better for bulk processing, Linkrify better for maximum accuracy.

Pricing: Completely free; no premium tier available

3. Duplichecker - Best Plagiarism Detection Accuracy

Website: duplichecker.com
Best For: Academic users and content creators needing precise plagiarism detection

Duplichecker specializes in plagiarism detection and delivered the highest accuracy in my testing. If this is your primary need, it outperforms Linkrify and most alternatives.

What I Tested:

Plagiarism Detection Deep Dive:

• Detected 14.2% plagiarism (actual was 15%)—highest accuracy tested

• Identified paraphrased content other tools missed

• Processing time: 41 seconds

• Showed side-by-side comparison with matched sources

• Provided clickable links to original sources

Grammar Checking:

• Caught 17 out of 20 errors (85% accuracy)

• Stronger than expected for a plagiarism-focused tool

• Offered contextual suggestions

• Integration with premium Grammarly available

Additional Tools Performance:

• Offers 100+ tools like Linkrify

• Backlink checker found 791 links (64% of Ahrefs data)

• Domain authority checker aligned closely with Moz scores

• Word counter, article rewriter, and more

Pros:

• Superior plagiarism detection accuracy

• Deep source attribution

• 1,000 words free per check (upgradeable)

• Detailed comparison reports

• Clean result presentation

Cons:

• Requires registration for full features

• Daily check limits on free tier

• Backlink data less comprehensive

• Some tools behind paywall

• Moderate ad presence

Comparison with Linkrify: Duplichecker's plagiarism detection is 5-6% more accurate based on my testing. If plagiarism checking is your primary use case, this is the superior alternative. Linkrify offers broader tool variety, but Duplichecker excels at its specialty.

Pricing: Free tier with 1,000 words/check; Premium from $10/month for unlimited checks

4. Prepostseo - Best All-in-One Platform

Website: prepostseo.com
Best For: Agencies and professionals managing multiple clients

Prepostseo offers 95+ tools with a surprisingly polished user experience for a free platform. Their organization and interface design impressed me during testing.

What I Tested:

Platform Organization:

• Tools categorized logically (Writing, SEO, Images, Others)

• Search function works well for finding specific tools

• Dashboard saves recent checks

• Chrome extension available

Plagiarism Checker Quality:

• Detected 11.8% plagiarism (actual 15%)

• Processing: 35 seconds

• Beautiful visual report with pie charts

• Export options (PDF, Word)

• Comparison view showed matched text highlighted

Grammar and Spell Checking:

• Found 16 out of 20 errors (80% accuracy)

• Provided context and explanations

• Integrated thesaurus for word suggestions

• Readability score included

SEO Tool Performance:

• DA checker matched Moz scores within 2-3 points

• Backlink checker found 854 links

• Keyword density tool very useful

• Meta tag analyzer helped optimize pages

Pros:

• Excellent user interface design

• Wide tool variety (95+ tools)

• Export functionality

• Browser extension available

• Good mobile experience

• Active development and updates

Cons:

• Moderate plagiarism accuracy

• Some premium-only features

• Account required for best experience

• Processing can slow during high traffic

• Ads present but not intrusive

Comparison with Linkrify: Prepostseo offers better UX and organization than Linkrify, though plagiarism accuracy was 2-3% lower in testing. Better for professional users who value interface quality and workflow integration.

Pricing: Free with limitations; Premium from $10/month adds unlimited checks and removes ads

5. SEO Review Tools - Best for Technical SEO Analysis

Website: seoreviewtools.com
Best For: Technical SEO professionals and webmasters

SEO Review Tools focuses heavily on technical SEO diagnostics—site audits, speed testing, mobile optimization, and structured data validation. Different approach than Linkrify's content-focused tools.

What I Tested:

Technical SEO Capabilities:

• Website speed test matched Google PageSpeed insights

• Mobile-friendly test accurately identified issues

• Robots.txt validator worked flawlessly

• XML sitemap generator performed well

• Schema markup validator caught errors other tools missed

Content Tools (Secondary Focus):

• Plagiarism checker detected 10% (actual 15%)—lower accuracy

• Grammar checking basic but functional

• Keyword density analyzer very detailed

• Readability checker provided Flesch score

Backlink and Domain Analysis:

• Backlink checker found 678 links (55% accuracy vs Ahrefs)

• Domain authority close to Moz scores

• Page authority checker useful for specific URLs

• Comparison tool for analyzing multiple domains

Pros:

• Excellent technical SEO tools

• Website audit comprehensive

• No registration required

• Minimal advertising

• Tools load quickly

• Focused, professional approach

Cons:

• Weaker plagiarism detection

• Limited content writing tools

• Smaller tool selection (~40 tools)

• Backlink data less comprehensive

• Basic UI design

Comparison with Linkrify: SEO Review Tools excels at technical SEO analysis where Linkrify focuses on content tools. Different use cases. Choose this if you're optimizing website performance and technical elements; choose Linkrify for content creation and plagiarism checking.

Pricing: Completely free; no premium tier

6. Plagiarism Detector - Specialized Content Verification

Website: plagiarismdetector.net
Best For: Students and educators needing academic-grade checking

Plagiarism Detector takes a specialized approach, focusing primarily on plagiarism detection with academic integrity features. Narrower scope than Linkrify but deeper in its specialty.

What I Tested:

Academic-Focused Plagiarism Checking:

• Detected 13.7% plagiarism (actual 15%)—second-highest accuracy

• Searched across academic databases and journals

• Identified paraphrasing better than general tools

• Processing: 52 seconds (slower due to deeper search)

• Detailed citation suggestions for matched content

Unique Features:

• Checks against academic papers and journals

• Provides proper citation formats (APA, MLA, Chicago)

• Similarity index specifically for academic work

• Batch checking for multiple documents

• Teacher/student account types with different features

Grammar Integration:

• Partners with grammar checking services

• Basic grammar checking included

• Not as comprehensive as dedicated grammar tools

• Focuses on academic writing style

Pros:

• Academic database access

• Citation assistance

• High accuracy for academic content

• Batch processing available

• Institution-friendly features

• Less focus on commercial content

Cons:

• Limited non-plagiarism tools

• Slower processing for thorough checks

• Academic focus may not suit all users

• Daily limits on free tier

• Requires account for full features

Comparison with Linkrify: Plagiarism Detector is more accurate for academic content but offers far fewer additional tools. Linkrify provides better all-around utility; Plagiarism Detector wins for student/educator-specific needs.

Pricing: Free tier limited; Plans from $12/month for students, $25/month for professionals

7. SEOBook Tools - Best for SEO Professionals

Website: tools.seobooks.com
Best For: SEO consultants and advanced users

SEOBook Tools offers a curated selection of professional-grade SEO tools created by Aaron Wall, a respected SEO authority. Quality over quantity approach distinguishes it from Linkrify's broader toolkit.

What I Tested:

SEO-Specific Tools:

• Keyword suggestion tool provided detailed search volumes

• Rank checker accurately tracked positions across search engines

• Link juice calculator helped with internal linking strategy

• Robots.txt generator created properly formatted files

• HTTP status checker identified redirect chains

Content Analysis:

• No plagiarism checker (major limitation vs Linkrify)

• Keyword density analyzer very detailed

• SEO page comparison tool excellent for competitive analysis

• Meta tag extractor useful for research

• Readability tools basic but functional

Professional Features:

• Tools designed for experienced users

• Detailed documentation and guides

• Community forum for strategy discussion

• Training resources included

• API access for some tools

Pros:

• Professional-grade tool quality

• Created by SEO authority

• No ads or distractions

• Excellent documentation

• Advanced features for consultants

• Free and unlimited usage

Cons:

• No plagiarism or grammar checking

• Limited tool count (~15 tools)

• Steeper learning curve

• Interface dated but functional

• Not ideal for beginners

• Focused solely on SEO, not content

Comparison with Linkrify: SEOBook Tools serves a completely different audience. Linkrify better for content creators needing plagiarism/grammar tools; SEOBook better for SEO professionals doing keyword research and competitive analysis.

Pricing: Completely free; some advanced features require SEO Book membership ($300/year)

8. WebFX Free Tools - Best Visual Reporting

Website: webfx.com/tools
Best For: Marketers who need shareable reports and visual data

WebFX, a major digital marketing agency, offers free SEO tools with exceptional reporting and visualization. Their tools prioritize professional presentation over raw feature count.

What I Tested:

Reporting Quality:

• Tools generate beautiful, client-ready reports

• Visual charts and graphs included

• Export to PDF maintains formatting

• Branding customization available

• Social sharing built-in

Available Tools Performance:

• Backlink checker found 712 backlinks (57% of Ahrefs data)

• Keyword research tool provided competition metrics

• Website speed test matched Google insights

• Readability calculator detailed and accurate

• Meta tag generator helped with optimization

Limitations:

• No plagiarism checker (critical gap vs Linkrify)

• No grammar checking tools

• Limited to ~20 SEO-focused tools

• Some tools redirect to premium services

• Gated content requires email signup

Pros:

• Exceptional report design

• Professional presentation

• Accurate SEO metrics

• Agency-quality output

• Good for client presentations

• Clean, modern interface

Cons:

• Missing content tools (plagiarism, grammar)

• Limited tool selection

• Some features lead to sales pages

• Email required for some tools

• Not comprehensive for daily use

Comparison with Linkrify: WebFX excels at professional reporting but lacks Linkrify's content creation tools entirely. Use WebFX when you need impressive reports for clients or stakeholders; use Linkrify for day-to-day content checking and SEO tasks.

Pricing: Free tools available; WebFX primary business is paid agency services

9. Neil Patel's Ubersuggest - Best Keyword Research Integration

Website: neilpatel.com/ubersuggest
Best For: Content marketers focusing on keyword strategy

Ubersuggest by Neil Patel has evolved from a simple keyword tool into a comprehensive SEO platform. The free tier offers substantial value, though with limitations compared to Linkrify's unlimited approach.

What I Tested:

Keyword Research Power:

• Generated 350+ keyword suggestions from seed keyword

• Showed search volume, difficulty, and CPC data

• Provided seasonal trends and SERP analysis

• Content ideas based on keyword data

• Question-based keyword variations

Free Tier Limitations:

• 3 searches per day on free tier (major restriction)

• Limited backlink data (100 links shown)

• Domain overview provides high-level metrics

• Site audit scans limited pages

• Historical data restricted

What's Missing vs Linkrify:

• No plagiarism checking

• No grammar correction tools

• No PDF converters or utility tools

• Focused exclusively on SEO and keywords

• Content writing tools absent

Unique Strengths:

• Chrome extension for SERP analysis

• Content ideas generator excellent

• Competitor keyword analysis

• Traffic estimation for keywords

• SERP preview tool

Pros:

• Powerful keyword research

• Competitive intelligence features

• Chrome extension very useful

• Neil Patel's methodology built-in

• Content strategy guidance

• Regular updates and improvements

Cons:

• Severe daily limits (3 searches/day free)

• No content verification tools

• Missing utility features

• Premium push throughout interface

• Limited compared to paid version

• Different tool category than Linkrify

Comparison with Linkrify: Ubersuggest and Linkrify serve different primary purposes. Ubersuggest dominates for keyword research and content strategy; Linkrify wins for content verification and utility tools. Ideally, use both for different stages of content creation.

Pricing: Free tier very limited; Individual plan $12/month, Business $20/month, Enterprise $40/month

10. Copyscape - Premium Alternative for Critical Projects

Website: copyscape.com
Best For: Publishers and agencies requiring maximum plagiarism detection accuracy

Copyscape isn't entirely free like other alternatives, but its freemium model and industry-standard accuracy warrant inclusion. When plagiarism detection absolutely must be perfect, Copyscape is the benchmark.

What I Tested:

Plagiarism Detection Gold Standard:

• Free version checks public URLs only

• Detected 14.8% plagiarism (actual 15%)—highest accuracy of all tools tested

• Premium batch check processed 10 documents in 3 minutes

• Identified partial matches other tools missed

• Crawled more pages than any alternative

How It Works:

• Free: Enter URL to check if content appears elsewhere online

• Premium: Upload documents or paste text ($0.03-$0.05 per search)

• Batch: Check multiple documents automatically

• API: Integrate into CMS or workflow

• Copysentry: Continuous monitoring for content theft

No Additional Tools:

• Solely focused on plagiarism detection

• No grammar checking

• No SEO tools

• No backlink analysis

• Single-purpose platform

Pros:

• Industry-standard accuracy

• Used by major publishers

• Comprehensive database search

• Detailed matching reports

• API integration available

• Batch processing efficient

• Monitors content theft automatically

Cons:

• Not truly free (pay per use)

• No bundled tools like Linkrify

• Cost adds up with heavy use

• Free version very limited

• Only does plagiarism checking

• Requires credits/payment for full features

Comparison with Linkrify: Copyscape detects plagiarism 5-6% more accurately than Linkrify but costs money and offers nothing beyond plagiarism checking. Use Copyscape when accuracy is critical (academic, legal, publishing); use Linkrify for everyday content verification plus bonus SEO tools.

Pricing: Free URL checker; Premium starts at $0.03-$0.05 per search (100 searches ≈ $3-5)

Choose SmallSEOTools if you:

• Need the widest variety of tools (100+)

• Want everything in one platform

• Can tolerate ads for free access

• Check multiple types of content regularly

• Value comprehensiveness over specialization

Choose SEOToolsCentre if you:

• Process high volumes of content

• Value speed over maximum accuracy

• Prefer clean, simple interfaces

• Don't want to create accounts

• Need quick checks throughout the day

Choose Duplichecker if you:

• Plagiarism detection is your #1 priority

• Need highly accurate content verification

• Work with academic or sensitive content

• Want detailed source attribution

• Can work within daily check limits

Choose Prepostseo if you:

• Manage multiple clients or projects

• Value professional UX and organization

• Need export and reporting features

• Want browser extension integration

• Run an agency or consultancy

Choose SEO Review Tools if you:

• Focus on technical SEO optimization

• Need website performance analysis

• Optimize site speed and mobile experience

• Validate structured data and sitemaps

• Work as webmaster or developer

Choose Plagiarism Detector if you:

• Work in academic or educational settings

• Need to check against scholarly databases

• Require citation format assistance

• Process student or research papers

• Value academic integrity features

Choose SEOBook Tools if you:

• Are an experienced SEO professional

• Need advanced keyword and rank tracking

• Value quality over quantity

• Don't need content verification tools

• Want professional-grade SEO analysis

Choose WebFX Tools if you:

• Create reports for clients or stakeholders

• Need visual, shareable results

• Value professional presentation

• Focus on SEO metrics over content tools

• Work in marketing or agency environment

Choose Ubersuggest if you:

• Keyword research is primary focus

• Create content strategies

• Analyze competitor keywords

• Can work within 3 searches/day limit

• Want Neil Patel's methodology

Choose Copyscape if you:

• Accuracy matters more than cost

• Publish content professionally

• Face legal/copyright concerns

• Can afford pay-per-use model

• Need industry-standard detection

Stick with Linkrify if you:

• Need balanced all-around performance

• Want good-enough accuracy for most use cases

• Prefer moderate tool variety

• Don't want to juggle multiple platforms

• Value simplicity and ease of use

My Personal Recommendation

After two weeks of intensive testing, here's my honest assessment:

For most users, I recommend using a combination:

1. Primary platform: SmallSEOTools or Prepostseo for daily checks and variety

2. Specialized plagiarism: Duplichecker when accuracy matters most

3. Keyword research: Ubersuggest free tier for content strategy

4. Technical SEO: SEO Review Tools for site audits

Linkrify remains a solid middle-ground option if you want everything in one place with decent performance. It won't excel at any single task, but it handles most needs adequately.

For critical projects: Invest in Copyscape premium checks for maximum plagiarism accuracy. The $3-5 cost for important documents is worth the peace of mind.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Can I use multiple free SEO tools together?
A: Absolutely. I recommend using specialized tools for different purposes rather than relying on one platform. Use Duplichecker for plagiarism, SEOToolsCentre for speed, and Ubersuggest for keywords.

Q: Why do different plagiarism checkers show different results?
A: Each tool searches different databases, uses different algorithms, and updates at different frequencies. A 5-10% variance between tools is normal. For critical checks, use multiple tools.

Q: Do I need to create accounts on these platforms?
A: Most require registration for full features or unlimited checks. SEOToolsCentre and SEO Review Tools work without accounts. SmallSEOTools and others offer more features to registered users.

Q: How often should I check content for plagiarism?
A: Check all content before publication, especially if outsourced. For internally created content, spot-check regularly. Academic work should always be verified before submission. If you're using AI writing tools or AI content generators, always run plagiarism checks as AI can sometimes reproduce training data.

Q: Are free SEO tools accurate enough for professional use?
A: For most professional work, yes. However, critical projects (legal documents, academic papers, major publications) warrant paid tools like Copyscape or Grammarly Premium for maximum accuracy. Consider your content type—if you're creating social media content, free tools often suffice. For professional presentations or business documents, invest in premium options.

QQ: Can these tools detect AI-generated content?
A: Traditional plagiarism checkers detect copied content, not AI generation. You'd need specialized AI detection tools for that purpose. However, tools like Grubby AI can help humanize AI content, while Kipper AI and Phrasly AI offer AI detection and bypass features.

Q: Which tool has the most accurate backlink data?
A: None of these free tools match premium services like Ahrefs or Moz. For free options, SmallSEOTools and Prepostseo provided 70-75% accuracy in my testing—good enough for basic analysis. For comprehensive SEO strategy, also check our technical SEO guide.

Q: Are there completely unlimited free options?
A: SEOToolsCentre and SEO Review Tools don't impose daily limits. Most others restrict free tier usage. Read terms carefully as limits may change.

Final Thoughts: Beyond Just Tools

While this guide focuses on Linkrify alternatives, the real question isn't "which tool is best?" but rather "how do I create content that doesn't need these tools?"

The best plagiarism defense is creating original content. The best grammar is writing clearly from the start. The best SEO strategy is providing genuine value—as covered in our guides on search engine basics and on-page SEO optimization.

Use these tools for verification and optimization, not as crutches. Google's latest updates reward original insight and expertise over perfectly optimized generic content. For content creation at scale, consider exploring AI content generation tools that help you maintain quality while increasing output.

That said, when you need verification, testing showed clear winners:

• Overall winner: SmallSEOTools for variety, Duplichecker for accuracy

• Speed champion: SEOToolsCentre

• Professional choice: Prepostseo with Copyscape for critical checks

Your specific needs determine the best alternative to Linkrify. Bookmark 2-3 from this list, test them with your content, and see which workflow feels natural.

Related Resources

• Linkrify: Free SEO and Content Tools Guide
  
  
  About the Author: I'm a content strategist who tests SEO and content tools as part of my work helping businesses optimize their digital presence. This review reflects two weeks of hands-on testing with standardized samples across all platforms. Last updated: [20/10/2025]

Disclosure: This article contains some affiliate links, which means we may earn a small commission if you purchase through our links, at no cost to you. All opinions and testing results are my own based on actual usage.